ok, ok i’m a giants fan, so this is homer-positivity all the way, i’ll admit that upfront. but hear me out…the Giants are in the beginning of a national league dynasty.
two disclaimers to begin with:
1) i DO NOT think the giants will repeat in 2011. it is really hard to do, and in fact has proven to be impossible under the last two collective bargaining agreements (in place since 2002). the yankees haven’t done it, the red sox have won twice in that time frame but with two different teams, and the phillies went to the WS in back to back years but could not pull it off. playoff teams under the current CBA’s are evenly matched, meaning luck has a lot to do with it, and as much as i loved and appreciated the run of the 2010 giants (only WS champion in my life time and, for that matter, in my dad’s lifetime) they benefited from a good deal of amazing fortune (thank you cody ross, edgar renteria, brooks conrad, and the center field wall at AT&T, among other things, for that). all that to say any number of things could go incredibly wrong and mess it all up, which makes repeating very difficult, in fact impossible.
2) the competition is going to be good this year: the phillies just got scarier, the red sox have added a few good players, the rockies are locking up their young core, the white sox are quietly nasty, the reds could be even better this year, the cards can hit and pitch, don’t forget about the yankees (still pretty good) and it goes on and on. the giants are the same team essentially, and miguel tejada doesn’t exactly get the blood flowing.
with that in mind though, i do think the Giants have begun a golden era that could harken memories of the Atlanta Braves 1995-2005 run (or the yankees for that matter). let me explain:
1) the baseball powers of the day will be great in 2011 and 2012 but could enter into a down window after that:
i’ll post some red sox thoughts soon but maybe the best thing they’ve done is replace beltre/martinez with better (slightly) AND younger players. that’s key (the price to do was pretty steep however). on the other hand their rotation is getting old fast and it is my opinion that the last couple of years of the crawford deal will be painful (AGon, i think will age well).
same can be said for the phillies…as nasty as they will be in 2011, their guys are getting older and the game today, especially in regards to pitching, is more and more a young man’s game. they have a ton of cash tied in to three guys who will be in their mid 30’s, plus the lineup is aging fast (and showing it in injuries, a big reason i think the giants got past them in the NLCS)…it’s not hard to imagine philly trying to dump a lot of expensive old guys with big names after the 2012 season.
the yankees, as presently constructed, are in worse shape than anyone. they will be good in 2011 and certainly competitive every year after that, but again, tons of money invested in old and declining players means they will be vulnerable (see the 2010 NY Mets or the 2008 Yankees).
conclusion: the next two years are going to be ultra competitive and then a huge window will open up in which the big players will vulnerable. look for teams like the reds, royals, rays, and a’s to start thinking very strategically about the 2013-2014 window, the stars may be aligning for them during that time.
and it will be an opportunity for the Giants…
2) I will break down the Giants’ off-season and future outlook more in upcoming posts, but consider this…by the end of the 2011 season the Giants’ could have a lineup that feature a young, homegrown core of Posey C, Sandoval 3B, and Belt 1B to go along with the arms they already have.
a lot will have to break right for the following scenario to occur, but in 2013 the Giant’s will NOT have Rowand and probably not have Zito (any chance the Giants ship him to the Yankees now), and could have a completely homegrown lineup AND rotation:
CF Brown
RF Ford/Peguero
1B Belt
C Posey
3B Sandoval
LF Neal
2B Culberson
SS Crawford/Adrianza
1) Lincecum
2) Cain
3) Bumgartner
4) Wheeler
5) Runzler
and a bullpen built around Wilson, Romo, Sosa, at al.
conclusion: for that to happen a whole lot will have to go right. naturally, i don’t realistically think this will/could happen. but the giants are entering a window where they, like the vintage braves, could keep integrating a few young players each season around their core of great pitching providing the ground work for a consistent winner for the foreseeable future. a remarkable change events for giants fans. likely? we’ll see.
-SB
Pingback: What are the Giants Doing??? « baseballmonk
Wow, looking through your posts, I could have written many of them, particularly this one on the Dynasty and the ones about the Giants chances of repeating.
I’ve been saying for almost two seasons now that the 2010’s will be known as the Giants Decade, or Dynasty as you put it. They have the core young players, and just as importantly, Neukom sounds and looks like he is prepared to help fund keeping them together for as long as possible.
I’m also expecting the A’s to give the Giants $50-80M in a few years for the right to move to San Jose, and that money will help fund keeping the team together. In addition, MBLAM has been much more profitable than expected sooner, and should be supplying more money as well. Lastly, I expect a Bay Area billionaire to pony up $$$ to take over for Neukom by mid-decade and provide more money to keep the good times going.
Nice blog, keep up the good work!
OGC…THANK YOU for reading and commenting on our blog!!! I will add you to our blog roll. I’ve noticed your comments from time to time at McCovey Chronicles but never realized you blogged as well.
Thanks for your insight in to Neukom and the A’s deal…I didn’t realize the Giants could potentially get so much cash from that. Also, do you know when AT&T gets paid off? I think 2014, but it might be later…anyway, when that’s done that will be another chunk of cash available to go back in to the team.
Pingback: Rumors and Thoughts « baseballmonk
Pingback: Barry Zito…needed? « baseballmonk